Germany Secures €350m for Largest Synthetic Aviation Fuel Plant as EU Races Toward 2030 Mandates
- Feb 13
- 2 min read

A German consortium has secured €350 million in public funding to build what will be the country's largest industrial-scale plant for electro-sustainable aviation fuel, in a move that underscores the EU's accelerating push to decarbonise its skies ahead of binding blending mandates at the end of the decade.
Concrete Chemicals, a joint venture between renewable energy firm ENERTRAG and synthetic fuel producer Zaffra, will construct a power-to-liquid facility in Schwedt, Brandenburg. The plant is designed to produce more than 37,000 tonnes of synthetic fuel annually — including 30,000 tonnes of eSAF and 7,000 tonnes of e-naphtha — eliminating an estimated 100,000 tonnes of fossil CO₂ from aviation each year.
The funding, approved at both federal and state level, is now in final review by the European Commission under the bloc's Climate, Energy and Environmental Aid Guidelines framework. A final investment decision is expected by 2027, with production targeted to meet the EU's ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation, which introduces a 1.2 per cent eSAF blending sub-mandate from 2030.
The project will use biogenic CO₂ sourced from a local recycled paper manufacturer and green hydrogen to produce synthetic kerosene, and has been designed for future integration into Germany's planned national hydrogen backbone network.
Zaffra, a joint venture between South Africa's Sasol and Denmark's Topsoe, brings proprietary Fischer-Tropsch and power-to-X technology to the partnership. Its chief executive, Jan Toschka, described the project as proof that European technology can deliver energy resilience alongside climate ambition.
The announcement comes as the EU's sustainable fuel sector grapples with a difficult paradox: several production facilities are expected to come online ahead of regulatory demand, potentially creating short-term overcapacity even as the continent's airlines face an irreversible transition away from fossil kerosene.










Comments