Europe's Battery Push Faces Headwinds as Trump Revives US Fossil Fuel Agenda
- Jan 20
- 2 min read

Brussels unveiled a €1.8 billion battery strategy this month as European automakers grapple with declining internal combustion engine sales and intensifying competition from Chinese manufacturers, even as the new Trump administration signals a dramatic reversal of America's electric vehicle transition.
The European Commission's automotive omnibus package introduces a new "small affordable cars" category and proposes revised car labelling rules, part of a broader industrial plan launched following January's Strategic Dialogue on the automotive sector's future. Battery-electric vehicles captured a record 21.3 per cent market share in November, with year-to-date registrations reaching 16.9 per cent across the EU, representing 1.66 million units.
Yet the sector's momentum remains fragile. Total EU registrations through November stood at 9.86 million vehicles, barely 1.4 per cent above prior-year levels and significantly below pre-pandemic volumes. Traditional petrol and diesel vehicles still commanded 36.1 per cent of the market despite a pronounced 20.2 per cent year-on-year decline.
The Commission's controversial steel safeguards proposal threatens to impose between €5 billion and €9 billion in additional tariff costs on downstream manufacturers, according to industry associations. The measure nearly halves import quotas whilst doubling out-of-quota tariffs to 50 per cent, potentially increasing European steel prices by 3.25 per cent on average—with some categories facing increases approaching 30 per cent.
Meanwhile, President Trump's 20 January inauguration speech pledged to "end the Green New Deal" and revoke federal EV mandates, declaring Americans would "buy the car of your choice." The administration's rollback of Biden-era fuel economy standards and elimination of EV tax credits positions the United States as a counterweight to Europe's electrification drive, potentially complicating transatlantic automotive trade and investment patterns as manufacturers navigate diverging regulatory frameworks on both sides of the Atlantic.










Comments